Identification Parade in Pakistan of Accused

Identification Parade in Pakistan of accused:


Our best lawyer in Pakistan from our law firm in Lahore says that in identification parade in Pakistan of accused and TEST IDENTIFICATION PARADE person without reference to the role allegedly played by him during the occurrence was shorn of any evidentiary value. SCMR 135 SCMR 135 “In the identification parade of accused person, if the person accused is identified with no indication of the role performed by them in the incident at this case, then the trial identification parade in Pakistan would be legally ineffective and has no significance in terms of evidence. The impact upon Delay when conducting an Identification Parade of accused 191 2011 SCMR 537 192 Mian Sohail Ahmed vs The State, 2019, SCMR 956-193 Adnan Vs. The State (2018 MLD 43) 194 2017 SCMR 1546 Lal Pasand vs State State.

Safeguard Against Criminal Convictions:

The Court, in this case through the best lawyer in Pakistan from our law firm in Lahore, decided that “the sole safeguard against criminal convictions that are not legitimate is for the judge or Judges who hear the case must be aware of the risks inherent in the identification of suspects through witnesses that are unknown to the accused. The best course in these situations is to conduct different identification parade in Pakistan for each defendant. No explanation was in the present case to justify not having separate parades for identification.” 1996 PCR.LJ 1584 Identification parades are organized following Art. 22 of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat 1984 for a two-fold purpose: The first is to establish the identity of the accused, and the second is to rule out the possibility of false implication of the accused by the complainant/witnesses for any ill designs. 197, 2018 SCMR 577120 2017 PCR.LJ 662198

Identification parade in Pakistan

A Delay in conducting the identification parade in Pakistan of the accused person could expose witnesses to the accused and undermine the credibility used in an Identification Parade. The case study Sarmad was a boy of 11 years old who was taken from his home after he went with his parents to the mosque to pray. The family discovered the missing child at approximately 9:00 pm on the 4th of July in 2020.

Police Report:

A police report was filed at 10:10 pm, claiming Sarmad was taken away to commit an unnatural offence. Around 11:00 pm, they received a call for ransom on their phone claiming Sarmad was being held and demanded the payment of Rs.10,00,000 in exchange for his life. The family immediately alerted the police, who traced the phone number to the location and started the search.

Witness – Afzal and Arshad:

Regarding identification parade in Pakistan On the 6th of July, Afzal and Arshad witnessed Sarmad riding a motorcycle with Shahzad and Furqan. On the 7th of July, the police got information regarding a body that was found dead located in a nearby area belonging to a boy who was 10-11 years old. The police inspector and Sarmad’s father were on the scene and located the remains of Sarmad, in which the cause of death was determined to be strangulation. As the investigation continues, new evidence has surfaced through the best lawyer in Pakistan from our law firm in Lahore. First, Furqan confessed to the crimes in front of Naveed Mahmoud, the local MPA and Saeed Natt.


The confession said that Furqan and Shahzad had taken Sarmad to pay the ransom and killed him for not paying. Following the confession through the best lawyer in Pakistan from our law firm in Lahore, when they arrested him, the police discovered other criminal items inside Shahzad’s home. This call was tracked back to an office in the local area and the person who made it. Qasim Ali admitted that Shahzad used the P.O. at the same moment that this call could be traced. The police organized an identification parade of accused persons to determine their footprints. Two suspects under the direction of a Special Judicial Magistrate.

Main Identification Process:

After receiving the identification parade in Pakistan, the accused were taken to a judicial lock-up after the regular investigation. Furqan was able to plead the charge of being a minor and will be charged with an additional document. How can information obtained from the accused be used? Article 40 of QSO199 deals with evidence collection due to the accused’s providing details. This covers the recovery of evidence based on the accused’s point. Remove Your Criminal Record.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *